EDITION / 7 OCTOBER 2026 / NEWS & CONTEXTOur editorial standard ↗
LondonLocal time
New YorkLocal time
TokyoLocal time
SydneyLocal time
China · BeijingLocal time
THE CONTEXT BEHIND CRYPTO.
MARKET WATCHBTC——ETH——SOL——LINK——All markets ↗
Markets

SEC proposes a crypto-custody framework for advisers and funds

The October 1 proposal addresses custody arrangements, including conditional self-custody. It is not a final rule or approval of individual tokens.

CoinEditorial2 min read
News brief · Source announcement: 1 October 2026
Editorial illustration: Conceptual illustration of institutional custody and payment infrastructure; not a photograph of the SEC
Original conceptual editorial illustration for CoinEditorial; not a photograph of an event.
THE TAKEAWAY

A proposed custody framework is a regulatory process, not a token endorsement.

The proposal

The US Securities and Exchange Commission proposed changes on 1 October covering crypto-asset custody by registered investment advisers and regulated funds. Its announcement identifies financial-statement audits and broker-dealer custody among the areas addressed.

What the announcement includes

The SEC says the proposal would allow self-custody in specified circumstances and permit state trust companies to act as custodians for client and fund crypto assets. The announced comment period is 60 days after publication of the proposing release in the Federal Register; the press-release date alone does not establish the closing deadline.

What readers should not infer

These are proposed rules. The announcement is not evidence of final adoption, approval of a particular provider or endorsement of a token. Readers assessing an investment service still need to establish its actual custody arrangements and permissions. This briefing summarises the SEC announcement, not legal advice or independent evaluation of a custodian.

Sources & further reading

Sources checked 7 October 2026. News summary based on the linked primary announcement; not independent field reporting. Found an error? Request a correction.

KEEP READING

More context. Better questions.

Explore all